02. Modern calls and remodeling agrarian policy of Ukraine

https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201711-02
Gadzalo Ja. M., Luzan Ju. Ja.
Pages: 9-22.

Full article: 
Abstract
The purpose. To show that optimization of the branch of agrarian production is accompanied both by localization or liquidation of separate degradation processes, in particular, erosion of soils, their dehumification and agrochemical degradation, and as a whole by heightening of ecological integrity of agricultural landscapes and economic efficiency of industrial systems. Methods. Field experiment, computer simulation modeling, economic-statistical analysis. Results. At perfecting branch structure of agroecosystems the quotient of soil-protective efficiency of terrain will be augmented in 1,5 times, sufficient balances of humus and biogenic elements will be generated, essential lowering of volumes of cargo transportations will be attained, power independence of production and heightening of its economic efficiency will be ensured. Conclusions. Multivariate simulation of perspective scripts of development of agricultural enterprises has displayed that its interbranch optimization will be accompanied by soil-protective perfection of agricultural landscapes’ structure and reduction of degradation processes. Creation and implementation of a complex of antierosion agrotechnical methods is applicable in the system of general long-term plan of development of agricultural production.


Key words: agroecosystem, antierosion methods, interbranch optimization agricultural production, crop rotations, localization of degradation processes, soil-protective efficiency.



References
  1. Ahrarnyy sektor ekonomiky Ukrayiny (stan i perspektyvy rozvytku)/[Prysyazhnyuk M.V., Zubets' M.V., Sabluk P.T. ta in.]; za red. M.V. Prysyazhnyuka, M.V. Zubtsya, P.T. Sabluka, V.Ya. Mersel'-Veselyaka, M.M.Fedorova. – K.: NNTsIAE, 2011. – 1008 s.
  2. Osnovy ekolohiyi. Pidruchnyk. – K.: Tsentr uchbovoyi literatury, 2010. – 312 s.
  3. Natsional'na dopovid' pro stan navkolyshn'oho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha v Ukrayini u 2000 rotsi. – K.: Minekonomresursiv , 2001. – S. 29.
  4. Dehodyuk E.H. Suchasnyy stan zemel'nykh resursiv Ukrayiny i shlyakhy vidnovlennya zemle- i pryrodokorystuvannya.//Zb. dop. Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konferentsiyi Stan zemel'nykh resursiv v Ukrayini: problemy, shlyakhy vyrishennya. – K.: Tsentr ekolohichnoyi osvity ta informatsiyi, 2001. – S. 32-37.
  5. Kataloh zakhodiv z optymizatsiyi struktury ahrolandshaftiv ta zakhystu zemel' vid eroziyi. — K., 2002. — 62 s.
  6. Enerhozberihayuchi ahroekosystemy. . – K.: DIA, 2011. – 576 s.
  7. Tararyko A.H., Verhunov V.A. Pochvozashchytnaya konturno-melyoratyvnaya systema zemledelyya. – K.: UkrYNTEN, 1992. – 72 s.
  8. Normatyvy gruntozakhysnykh konturno-melioratyvnykh system zemlerobstva. — K.: 1998. — 158 s.
  9. Rozrobka gruntozakhysnykh resurso- ta enerhozberihayuchykh system vedennya sil's'kohospodars'koho vyrobnytstva z vykorystannyam komp"yuternoho prohramnoho kompleksu (Metodychni rekomendatsiyi). – K.: Nora-Druk, 2002. – 109 s.
  10. Dovhostrokovi statsionarni pol'ovi doslidy Ukrayiny. Reyestr atestativ. /UAAN, NNTs «Instytut gruntoznavstva i ahrokhimiyi im. O.N. Sokolovs'koho». Redkol. P.I. Kovalenko ta in. Kharkiv, Vyd. «Drukarnya # 13». – 2006. - 120 s.
  11. Spetsializatsiya zemlerobstva – stratehichna osnova pidvyshchennya efektyvnosti i staloho rozvytku APK/M.I. Polupan, V.B. Solovey, V.A. Velychko ta in.//Visnyk ahrarnoyi nauky. – 2005. – # 5. – S. 5–16.